Ukraine won't recognize occupied territories as Russian as part of any peace deal, Zelensky says
Category: News & Politics
Via: vic-eldred • one week ago • 11 commentsBy: Kateryna Denisova (The Kyiv Independent)


Ukraine will not recognize any occupied territories as part of Russia under a potential future peace agreement with Moscow, President Volodymyr Zelensky told journalists on March 12.
"We are fighting for our independence. Therefore, we will not recognize any occupied territories as Russia's. This is a fact," Zelensky said.
"Our people have fought for this, our heroes died. How many injured, how many passed. No one will forget about it... This is the most important red line. We will not let anyone forget about this crime against Ukraine."
Zelensky's comments come a day after Kyiv agreed to a 30-day ceasefire put forth by the U.S. during the talks between the two countries in Jeddah. Ukraine said it was ready to move forward with the ceasefire if Russia did the same.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio later confirmed that Ukraine-U.S. talks in Saudi Arabia on March 11 included discussions about potential "territorial concessions" as part of a negotiated settlement with Russia.
The Trump administration has repeatedly said that both Kyiv and Moscow will have to make compromises for a peace deal, calling Ukraine's goal of restoring its pre-2014 borders "unrealistic."
'There will still be war' — Ukrainian soldiers on ceasefire proposal, Russia, and PutinThe "ball is in (Russia's) court," U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on March 11 after Kyiv and Washington emerged from talks in Saudi Arabia in agreement over a ceasefire proposal. After the negotiations with Washington, Ukraine announced that it was ready to accept a 30-day-long ceasefire…The Kyiv IndependentChris York
Russian forces currently occupy roughly 20% of Ukraine, from where reports of systematic repression, torture, and forced deportations regularly emerge. While a ceasefire and peace deal could freeze the war along current front lines, Ukraine is unlikely to ever recognize Russian-occupied territories as legally part of Russia.
Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts are partially controlled by Russian troops. Russia claims to have annexed the whole territory of those regions in 2022 despite not controlling two regional capitals — Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Moscow also controls all of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula.
When asked about sanctions or other steps to put pressure on Russia in case of violation of the ceasefire, Zelensky said that this move would depend on the U.S. side.
"If they (Russians) are not ready (for a ceasefire), we do hope that the American side will demonstrate exactly what it said," the president added.
Senator Lindsey Graham called for sanctions against Russia if Moscow refuses from a proposed ceasefire. He promised to introduce new congressional sanctions targeting Russia and nations that continue to buy Russian goods, including oil, gas, and uranium.
In the past, Russia has ruled out a temporary ceasefire that would freeze the conflict along the current front lines. Russian nationalist voices and pro-war bloggers have already spoken out against the U.S.-backed proposal.

That is a hard line.
ne will not recognize any occupied territories as part of Russia under a potential future peace agreement with Moscow, President Volodymyr Zelensky told journalists on March 12.
That's great if he has a reasonable plan of winning that territory back that consists of more than essentially hoping for a miracle.
I hope for Ukraine's sake that's just talk, because otherwise the suffering is going to continue and Ukraine is going to continue to lose it's country mile by mile.
Reports out of Kursk are not consistent with a Ukrainian army capable of taking back large swaths of territory. Avoiding the destruction of thousands of their best troops seems to be the urgent priority there.
While he is having this fantasy, why doesn't he demand Crimea back also?
Problem is that, considering what Putin is demanding and doesn't seem willing to negotiate on is simply unacceptable.
In other words, he wants all of that so that after he rebuilds his military, he can take over the rest of Ukraine. Putin doesn't give a crap about his own people. He wants his vision of Russia and he's perfectly willing to do whatever it takes to get it or die trying. He doesn't care how many he takes with him or who they are.
So, yeah, Ukraine is between a rock and a hard place. They're screwed no matter what he does. He takes a hard line now and suffers now or he takes whatever he can get in a deal and suffer later. And 99% guaranteed there's going to be a later.
My view is that we keep letting Putin do this because he's got nukes. Well, he keeps marching east and we keep doing nothing. I'm wondering if there's a geographical line where we realize that we just can't keep doing that. Eventually we'll run out of Europe to give up. My hope is that Putin comes down with a permanent case of not being alive real soon but even if that happens, that's probably not going to do much.
There simply isn't a good solution to this. There's not even one we can live with if we have to. We're just delaying the death of Ukraine.
I guess its when Ukraine decides its better to live to fight another day or not. If nothing changes Putin will probably just continue grinding Ukraine down and keep occupying more land. Absent American troops, which I oppose, there's really nothing I can see that will change the game. Offensive operations to reclaim land are going to require a lot more lives from Ukraine than simply trying to defend what they still have.
Are Ukraine's options going to improve the longer the war goes on? I think they'll just keep getting worse. Maybe a miracle happens and a peace party overthrows Putin and withdraws Russian troops. It's possible. I just don't see it happening.
My view is that we keep letting Putin do this because he's got nukes. Well, he keeps marching east and we keep doing nothing.
I think the nukes are a huge factor. Ukraine is not worth a nuclear exchange from America's point of view. The thing is that Russia is having a hard time moving east. A terribly hard time. No one, that I recall, expected Ukraine to be able to grind them down and basically stalemate them. I just don't see Russia having the people/equipment necessary to keep moving east. They've been exposed as much weaker than everyone thought.
If I were Ukraine, I'd want peace where the lines are, encourage the millions who fled to return, get the population growing again and prepare for Round 2 when the opportunity presents itself. Russia is going to get weaker over the next couple decades. This is as strong as russia will be for a generation.
That's kind of my point. The answer is that Ukraine's options aren't going to improve, period. They will keep getting worse whether they do a peace deal or not. The peace deal will not be a peace deal. It will just be an opportunity for Putin to refit and rearm. So, from Ukraine's view, it's die now or die later.
I mean, you don't think Putin's going to actually stop even if he signed the deal in his mother's blood, do you? He's not going to accept a deal that allows the West to rearm and refit Ukraine. He absolutely doesn't want a Ukraine that can defend itself.
Perhaps. Perhaps I'm being too pessimistic. But Putin is only going to live so long and he craves relevance. He craves a strong Russia that is a superpower. I don't think he gives a damn about his own people beyond how they can serve his vision. But maybe it would turn out as you say.
yeah, losing a war means terrible options. Personally, I think living to fight another day is better, especially with russia's medium to long term outlook. If Ukraine can survive another decade, the world might be a much different place.
Ok midgetman, you won’t recognize any occupied territory as russian, just be aware that you’re likely never to get it back
'Midgetman'? Why, exactly, are you making up childish derogatory nicknames for Zelensky? His nation was invaded, his people were and are being murdered (raped, tortured, ...). Ukraine is the victim here while Putin (Russia) is the invader. Ukraine is our ally, whereas Russia is our adversary.
On top of that, both Putin and Zelensky are 5'7" tall.
“Why, exactly, are you making up childish derogatory nicknames for Zelensky?”
Why? it should be rather obvious that i have no respect for him.”
”His nation was invaded”
yeah, no shit.
”his people were and are being murdered (raped, tortured, ...).”
and i wouldn’t be surprised if ukranian troops are doing the same to russian civilians.
“Ukraine is our ally,”
i didn’t realize we signed a valid agreement with ukraine, my bad.
”Russia is our adversary.”
Yes, but aside from nukes, they’re not even close to the adversary they used to be.
And why is it that you have no respect for him. Do you respect Putin?
No reports of such. Plenty of reports of Russion brutality.
Yeah, 'your bad'. Not only have we agreed to assist them, but they are an ally by definition since we are aiding them in a time of war.
DEFINITION
Oxford : ally : " a country that has agreed to help and support another country, especially in case of a war "
AGREEMENTS
An odd deflection. You agree that Russia is an adversary. Some progress. So why call our ally Zelensky a childish name making fun of his 5'7" stature and NOT do similarly for our adversary and his 5'7" stature?