╌>

Viral Video

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  4 weeks ago  •  158 comments

Viral Video
"Ironically several cheap fakes actually attack the president for thanking troops, that is what they are attacking the president for. Both in Normandy this happened and again in Italy. I think it tells you everything that we need to know about how desperate Republicans are here. And instead of talking about the president's performance in office, and what I mean by that is his legislative wins, what he's been able to do for the American people across the country, we're seeing these deep fakes,...

Link to quote: White House Calls Biden Videos 'Fake', Sparking Republican Outrage (msn.com)


As former President Trump took his message to the hood, venturing into the deepest of blue cities, Detroit, getting the endorsement of a former mayor and then going to a Black church, Joe Biden attended a democrat fundraiser in Los Angeles, which included many of Hollywood's elites, such as George Clooney, Julia Roberts and Barbara Streisand. The fundraiser was hosted by late night host Jimmy Kimmel and featured former President Obama. The centerpiece of the event was Biden and Obama doing a 40-minute sit-down with Kimmel. Joe Biden delivered a brief divisive rant in which trashed the Supreme Court of the United States for not making the kind of decisions the radical left wants.

Then another one of those strange things happened again as Joe Biden was about to exit the stage. It appeared to every conscious human being that Obama took Biden and guided him off the stage, never taking his hand off of Biden. 



That video went viral. Of course, I'll be called a "liar" here on NT for showing it, but people should be able to come to their own conclusions.

The worst part wasn't the video itself. It was that WH press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, tried to dismiss it. She called the video "a cheap fake."




Let us get one thing straight for the lefties living in a bubble:

That video is not fake!  That is a fact.

You can try to give your own interpretation of what happened, but the film is authentic.

This is exactly what George Orwell tried to warn us about.


In other news:

Netanyahu dissolves his War Cabinet. A shift in operations may be underway to deal with Hezbollah in the north. The Israeli military said it had suspended operations during the daylight hours in southern Gaza. That may help aid workers.

Ships from China and the Philippines collided in a disputed area of the South China Sea.

Triple digit heat hit the Midwest. The heat wave is expected to linger over the East Coast this week. New York City will open cooling centers today.

The Washington Post has been reeling from successive revelations about its incoming editor and its chief executive.

180 Street Church Pastor Lorenzo Sewell says that former President Trump is gaining "street credibility in the hood."

The resistance to a possible mass deportation should Trump win back the WH has begun. Biden has announced "new rules" to prevent hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants from being deported, Others are considering lawsuits.

Electric vehicle startup Fisker files for bankruptcy.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

Good morning.

There is no need for hysterics.

GQToLuJWsAA0w-m?format=jpg&name=small

Our objection to Biden is not dementia. It is policies!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago

there's only one shrinking segment of our population that are so pathetically gullible and ignorant enough to be fooled by the selectively edited videos coming from the convicted felon's accomplices ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1    4 weeks ago
the selectively edited videos

Now that is a lie.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    4 weeks ago
Now that is a lie.

thanks for proving my point...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    4 weeks ago

Nothing was edited.

You are welcome.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.3    4 weeks ago

You apparently did not see the video of the same scene, but from a few seconds before, when Biden was smiling and waving to the audience , and even turning to face the other side of the auditorium and waving.  To believe "your" video we have to believe that Biden went from being aware and engaged to being in a standing coma within less than 5 seconds.  It is ridiculous, pathetic, and frankly unAmerican for the right to keep spreading this junk. 

I wish we didnt have to make lying from right wing media and right wing social media a big campaign issue, but seemingly we have to. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.4    4 weeks ago
to being in a standing coma within less than 5 seconds. 

Did I say anything about him in a coma?

All I do is present the film of a video that went viral. A film that is unedited and real, contrary to the WH press secretary's lie about it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.5    4 weeks ago

Biden was not frozen, he was looking out at the audience he had been waving to and smiling at a FEW SECONDS before . Maybe he was enjoying the applause. Maybe Obama had to go pee and knew it would be inappropriate for him to walk away from the president. Of course they were going to walk off together. 

The few seconds of video you show has no context whatsoever. It just shows Biden standing there and Obama wanting to leave the stage. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.6    4 weeks ago

Ya, there are a lot of "maybes."

Maybe we let the people decide.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.1    4 weeks ago

Now that is the truth!

So refreshing to see here.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    4 weeks ago

I don't know why lies are allowed to be posted over and over and over again.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.10  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.3    4 weeks ago
Nothing was edited.

which comment is a lie?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.1.10    4 weeks ago

Obviously the one that claims the videos are fake.

I want to thank you for all the help today.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.12  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    4 weeks ago

We are at the “Biden laptop is Russian disinformation”  stage of trying to cover up damaging information. Democrats have staked out their ridiculous lie, and now the media is actively  amplifying the lie and  are  working to label the truth as a  conspiracy theory.  The playbook is getting a lot of use.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.11    4 weeks ago

He always tells the truth.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.14  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @1.1    4 weeks ago
selectively edited videos

Prove it.  Show the unedited videos and prove them wrong.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.15  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @1.1.10    4 weeks ago

Reminds one of the "I will be a dictator" misinformation the dems are still peddling.  

There is a difference between editing a video and lacking the context (spin) folks on the left would like to see.  Obviously they are afraid to show the whole video without trying to sway the like minded to what it meant.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.16  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.6    4 weeks ago
The few seconds of video you show has no context whatsoever.

The video needs no context (which translates into conjecture and spin)

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.17  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.7    4 weeks ago
Maybe we let the people decide.

You mean they don't need to be told what to think and are capable of watching a video and coming to their own conclusions?  Come on man.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.18  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.17    4 weeks ago

800

You see the 0:00 ?   

The so called damaging to Biden video STARTS with him being "frozen". Where is the full picture? Where is the context?  There isnt any.  They started with this frame because if they had included a few seconds before this it would show Biden acting perfectly normal. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.19  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.18    4 weeks ago
They started with this frame because if they had included a few seconds before this it would show Biden acting perfectly normal. 

Yes, he was normal and then he froze.  That is what freezing is.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.20  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.19    4 weeks ago

Just tell us why the "damaging" video STARTS with Biden "frozen".  There is no other explanation other than it wants to be intentionally deceptive. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.21  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.20    4 weeks ago
There is no other explanation other than it wants to be intentionally deceptive. 

Funny, the video showing the few seconds before may be more damaging.  It shows Joe applauding and then staring into space. 

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
1.1.22  Drakkonis  replied to  devangelical @1.1.10    4 weeks ago

I'm not sure what the extra context provides. Even with it, Biden still appears to be unfocused. The rest of the national leaders appear to be focused on what they are standing there to do; speaking to the press, apparently. Biden seems to be distracted and unfocused, even with what is called extra content. The Italian Prime Minister has to get him refocused. Had it been Obama, I imagine that the rest of the world leaders present would have simply waited for him to finish speaking to the paratroopers. I don't think it would have crossed any of their minds to interrupt him. 

If we want to talk about context, why is it that, so often, Biden has to be guided and handled as often as he does? Surely his handlers know how this is perceived and portrayed by their enemies? And yet, even Obama found it necessary, for whatever reason, to grab the current President of the United States and take him off stage, whether he wanted to leave or not. I cannot imagine Obama standing for such a thing being done to him while he had been president. 

So, to answer your question, which comment is a lie, I would say any that claim that Biden isn't quite often distracted, loses his train of thought, confused and generally disoriented. Just the other day, he actually said the word "pause" after a portion of a speech he was giving from a teleprompter that obviously wasn't intended to be read aloud, for goodness sake. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.1.23  JBB  replied to  Drakkonis @1.1.22    4 weeks ago

FDR was crippled and sick yet he successfully led the World!

Biden is successfully leading the World post-Trump & Covid.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.24  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @1.1.23    4 weeks ago
FDR was crippled and sick yet he successfully led the World!

Exactly, he knew he was dying of congestive heart failure and he and his administration hid the truth from the American people and he decided to run for a fourth term anyway.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.25  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.17    4 weeks ago

That seems so simple, but the media disagrees:

Just in: The Associated Press has issued a ‘fact check’ on the viral video of Biden freezing up on stage and being led off by Obama. Despite having a video that clearly shows what happened, the AP talked to a ‘source’ about the incident.

“CLAIM: Biden froze onstage during his fundraiser in Los Angeles on Saturday night and had to be led away by Obama.”

“THE FACTS: Biden paused amid cheers and applause as he exited the stage with his predecessor following an interview moderated by late-night host Kimmel.” The AP then cited a “source.” “A source who helped organize, and attended, the fundraiser told the AP that there was nothing noteworthy about this moment and that Obama wanted to be “chummy” by walking offstage with Biden.”


See how they did that.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
1.1.26  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.25    4 weeks ago

Don't believe your eyes, believe what we tell you.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.27  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.25    4 weeks ago

Listen to our Democratic source!!!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.28  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.26    4 weeks ago

Based on what someone there told them really happened.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.29  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.27    4 weeks ago

Like we were told: "The video started with Biden frozen." 

I guess it should have started when he got out of bed.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
1.1.30  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.29    4 weeks ago

i don't think the temperature was cold enough that day

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.31  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Igknorantzruls @1.1.30    4 weeks ago

That's a good excuse.

Noted.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago
Our objection to Biden is not dementia. It is policies!

And because of your objection to policies you seek to elect as PotUS a convicted felon who is the only PotUS in our history to have attempted to steal a US presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement.   A pathological lying con-man, malignant narcissist who has demonstrated over and over that he only cares about himself and is willing to throw the nation under the bus to satisfy his personal needs.

Beyond that, he is an entirely unpresidential vindictive loose-cannon asshole who should never be allowed to be the face and voice of our nation and be enabled with such power. 

Biden is indeed a lousy candidate and should not be running for reelection at his age,  but Trump (and anyone like him) should never even be considered because he is —as a person— wholly unfit to hold any public office.   (And he is also too old.)

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
1.2.1  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @1.2    4 weeks ago
to elect as PotUS a convicted felon who is the only PotUS in our history to have attempted to steal a US presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement.   A pathological lying con-man, malignant narcissist who has demonstrated over and over that he only cares about himself and is willing to throw the nation under the bus to satisfy his personal needs. Beyond that, he is an entirely unpresidential vindictive loose-cannon asshole who should never be allowed to be the face and voice of our nation and be enabled with such power. 

Why don't you tell us how you really feel.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.2  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @1.2.1    4 weeks ago

Do you acknowledge any wrongdoing by Trump?

Do you acknowledge any personal characteristics of Trump that counter what this nation would seek in its president?

Have you ever considered what Reagan might say about Trump as 2024 presumptive nominee of the GOP?

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
1.2.3  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.2    4 weeks ago
Do you acknowledge any wrongdoing by Trump? Do you acknowledge any personal characteristics of Trump that counter what this nation would seek in its president?

Sure I do, Trump is a flawed individual in many ways.  Do you acknowledge the corruption of the Biden Family and his lies to the American people that got him elected in 2020?  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.4  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @1.2.3    4 weeks ago
Sure I do, Trump is a flawed individual in many ways. 

Do you acknowledge wrongdoing by Trump?    If so, do you acknowledge that Trump is the only PotUS in history to attempt to steal a presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement?

Do you acknowledge the corruption of the Biden Family and his lies to the American people that got him elected in 2020?  

What, specifically, are you alleging here?    I cannot answer unless I know what you are talking about.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.2.5  Ronin2  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.4    4 weeks ago
Do you acknowledge  wrongdoing  by Trump?    If so, do you acknowledge that Trump is the only PotUS in history to attempt to steal a presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement?

Al Gore and Hillary Clinton; and a host of other Democrats at the state and local level. As for your incitement BS. Go find the Jan 6th committee and have a pity party with them. You are ignoring all evidence that Trump didn't incite anything- just like they did.

What,  specifically , are you alleging here?    I cannot answer unless I know what you are talking about.

Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation. Completely false and the FBI knew it. 

A former CIA official testified that then- Biden campaign senior adviser, now-Secretary of State Antony Blinken "played a role in the inception" of the public statement signed by current and past intelligence officials that claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell testified before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, and revealed that Blinken was "the impetus" of the public statement signed in October 2020 that implied the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was disinformation.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, sent a letter to Blinken Thursday, notifying him that the panels are "conducting oversight of federal law-enforcement and intelligence matters within our respective jurisdictions."

"We are examining that public statement signed by 51 former intelligence officials that falsely discredited a New York Post story regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop as supposed Russian disinformation," they wrote. "As part of our oversight, we have learned that you played a role in the inception of this statement while serving as a Biden campaign advisor, and we therefore request your assistance with our oversight."

In October 2020, weeks before the presidential election, dozens of ex-national security officials signed onto a letter claiming that Hunter's laptop had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."

The former officials included former Obama CIA Director John Brennan, former Obama DNI James Clapper, and former CIA director, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, among others. 

The lawmakers said that based on Morell’s testimony, it is "apparent" that the Biden campaign "played an active role in the origins of the public statement, which had the effect of helping to suppress the Hunter Biden story and preventing American citizens from making a fully informed decision during the 2020 presidential election."

"Although the statement’s signatories have an unquestioned right to free speech and free association—which we do not dispute—their reference to their national security credentials lent weight to the story and suggested access to specialized information unavailable to other Americans," they wrote.

They added: "This concerted effort to minimize and suppress public dissemination of the serious allegations about the Biden family was a grave disservice to all American citizens’ informed participation in our democracy."

WASHINGTON, D.C.  – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation. After the  New York Post  broke a story based on the contents of the laptop about Biden family influence peddling, the FBI made the institutional decision to refuse to answer direct questions from social media companies about the laptop’s authenticity—despite months of constant information sharing up to that time. Put simply, after the FBI conditioned social media companies to believe that the laptop was the product of a hack-and-dump operation, the Bureau stopped its information sharing, allowing social media companies to conclude that the  New York Post  story was Russian disinformation.

The  Post  published its story early in the morning on October 14. That same day, representatives from the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force attended a previously scheduled meeting with Twitter, during which a Twitter employee asked the FITF about the authenticity of laptop. According to Section Chief Dehmlow’s testimony, an analyst in the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division embedded in FITF began to respond that the laptop was real, when an FBI lawyer interrupted to say that the FBI had “no further comment,” regarding the laptop’s provenance:

Later on October 14, FITF met with Facebook. During the FITF-Facebook meeting, Dehmlow responded to a similar question from a Facebook employee about Hunter Biden’s laptop by stating that the FBI, again, had “no comment.” The FBI made this decision despite being in possession of the laptop and having confirmed its authenticity. According to Dehmlow, multiple personnel on FITF knew that the laptop was real. She testified:

In the hours following publication of the  Post ’s story, Twitter blocked the story from being shared, while Facebook deamplified the story, significantly reducing its circulation and prevalence in users’ newsfeeds. As the federal court in Missouri v. Biden explained in damning language, the FBI’s actions prevented millions of Americans from having a clear understanding about a salient issue in the 2020 presidential election:
 
The FBI’s failure to alert social-media companies that the Hunter Biden laptop was real, and not mere Russian disinformation, is particularly troubling. The FBI had the laptop in their possession since December 2019 and had warned social-media companies to look for a “hack and dump” operation by the Russians prior to the 2020 election. Even after Facebook specifically asked whether the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation, Dehmlow of the FBI refused to comment, resulting in the social-media companies’ suppression of the story. As a result, millions of U.S. citizens did not hear the story prior to the November 3, 2020 election.
 
Prior to the presidential election on November 3, 2020, the FBI never formally revealed that the laptop was “real” and in the FBI’s possession. As Dehmlow testified to the Committee, had the Hunter Biden story been a product of an actual Russian disinformation campaign, FITF would have been fully authorized to warn the companies of such a campaign: “But if there is a foreign malign influence operation and we’ve got specific details about how those actors are propagating information operations, influence operations on platforms, that’s something we could share the specific details of.” Instead, the refusal of FBI officials—the very officials who knew the laptop was real—to verify the authenticity of the laptop allowed widespread censorship about an otherwise accurate news story.

Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook restricting a story about Joe Biden's son during the 2020 election was based on FBI misinformation warnings.

The New York Post alleged leaked emails from Hunter Biden's laptop showed the then vice-president was helping his son's business dealings in Ukraine.

Facebook and Twitter restricted sharing of the article, before reversing course amid allegations of censorship.

Zuckerberg said that getting the decision wrong "sucks".

"When we take down something that we're not supposed to, that's the worst," Zuckerberg said in a rare extended media interview on the Joe Rogan podcast.

The New York Post story was released just weeks before the presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, which Mr Biden won.

It claimed that a laptop, abandoned in a repair shop by Hunter Biden, contained emails which included details of Hunter introducing a Ukrainian energy tycoon to his father and arranging a meeting. There is no record on Mr Biden's schedule that such a meeting ever took place.

Critically, it fed into long-running unproven allegations about corruption on Joe Biden's part to ensure his son's business success in Ukraine.

In that context, the New York Post story, based on exclusive data no other news agency had access to, was met with scepticism - and censored by social media outlets.

Zuckerberg told Rogan: "The background here is that the FBI came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump that's similar to that'."

He said the FBI did not warn Facebook about the Biden story in particular - only that Facebook thought it "fit that pattern".

A whopping 79 percent of Americans suggest President Donald Trump
likely would have won reelection if voters had known the truth about
Hunter Biden’s laptop—that it was real and not “Russian disinformation,” as
intelligence officials aligned with Joe Biden falsely led the public to
believe, a new national poll reveals.
The survey of 1,335 adults was conducted earlier this month by New Jerseybased Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics. The vast majority of
those following the issue said they believe that the laptop is real, while
only 11 percent still believe it was created by Russia. 

FBI coerced social media platforms on behalf of the Biden administration during the run up to the 2022 election; banning individuals and burying damaging stories.

.

A federal appeals court on Friday   limited the scope   of a district court ruling that restricted communications between government agencies and social media companies, while also finding that several agencies likely violated the First Amendment.

The ruling will make it easier for several federal agencies to communicate with social media companies such as   Meta ,   Google , and X, formerly known as Twitter, to flag concerns they see on the platforms. Still, officials who remain subject to the modified injunction, including those in the White House, must remain careful that their discussions with the platforms won’t be construed as coercive.

The   original case   was brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, who alleged that federal officials unduly pressured social media firms to limit speech on their platforms, as they communicated concerns about posts related to the Covid pandemic or elections. Terry A. Doughty, a Donald Trump-appointed chief judge for the Western District of Louisiana, issued an injunction in July that would significantly restrict these kinds of discussions, though he made exceptions for federal officials to warn about national security risks or criminal activity.

The decision had an immediate impact. Following the district court’s order in July, the State Department canceled its standing monthly meeting with Facebook officials on election prep,   The Washington Post r eported.

But on Friday, the three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals said that injunction was too broad. The panel narrowed the federal offices and agencies it could apply to and limited it in scope.

At the same time, the appeals court concluded that the White House, the Surgeon General’s office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation likely violated the First Amendment by coercing social media platforms into moderating posts on their sites. It also said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention likely violated the First Amendment, though its actions were “not plainly coercive.”

Guess you are part of the Harry Reid school of "it worked didn't it" when it comes to lying, coercion, and election interference. So long as it is Democrats doing it that is.

Biden is more guilty than Trump of mishandling and sharing classified information; but isn't being charge. Hur didn't want to be Durhamed by a Democrat judge, and a jury from a TDS driven Democrat controlled bastion of stupidity. Biden broke the law; as did his ghost writer who destroyed classified information and evidence that Biden knowingly shared with him. Of course Garland will never press charges- even with the overwhelming evidence- he is a partisan POS through and through.

Hur’s report says Biden  saved notebooks  from his time as vice president that contained classified information and used them to help Zwonitzer put together his memoir — sometimes reading from them verbatim for more than hour at a time. Biden did that, the report says, despite being aware from when he once suggested that Zwonitzer could be hired as historian for the Office of the Vice President, that the author did not have security clearance. The report details one of the boxes recovered by federal investigators was labeled “mark Z,” and that one recorded conversation with Zwonitzer in 2017 had Biden saying that he’d “just found all the classified stuff downstairs” of a home he was then renting in Virginia.

As for the Biden family taking money from Russia, China, Ukraine, and several ME countries and using shell company LLC's to hide the transactions and funnel money to family members- including Biden; you can google that yourself. Funny how Hunter and Joe's brother aren't being charged with FARA violations for not registering as foreign lobbyists. Ask Michael Flynn how much trouble that can get you in to. But they are Democrats so they are above the law.

The defense department inspector general has uncovered evidence that  Michael Flynn  accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars from foreign interests and governments, despite repeated warnings by the DoD and the justice department that his conduct might be illegal, the Guardian can reveal.

But while pleading guilty in 2017, Flynn also admitted to committing another crime: related to his acceptance of   hundreds of thousands of dollars from the government of Turkey without registering with the justice department as an agent of a foreign government, which   was required by law.

Now, according to people familiar with the confidential findings of the recently completed IG investigation, the Guardian can reveal Flynn was warned years earlier that his acceptance of foreign money and his not registering as a foreign agent likely would be illegal.

I am sure Weiss will get around to filing FARA charges against Hunter and Joe's brother eventually./S

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.6  TᵢG  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.5    4 weeks ago

I ignored your post since you refuse to acknowledge any wrongdoing by Trump.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.7  Texan1211  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.5    4 weeks ago
Funny how Hunter and Joe's brother aren't being charged with FARA violations for not registering as foreign lobbyists.

Funny?

More like sad and disgusting.

And expected, I suppose.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @1.2    4 weeks ago
And because of your objection to policies you seek to elect as PotUS a convicted felon who is the only PotUS in our history to have attempted to steal a US presidential election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement. 

I'd be a convicted felon if I was charged with anything in NYC. I'm glad you once again gave me the chance to remind everyone that the "conviction" for nonsense will be overturned. The election is about America vs the indoctrinated elite. And in case anyone doesn't understand what it means, I will remind them of Lincoln's all too relevent "House Divided Speech:"

“A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.”

That is what this election will determine.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.2.9  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.8    4 weeks ago

A House Divided?

What kind of citizen misleads their countrymen spreading false viral videos to make their own President look weak and confused? Now that their falsehoods are revealed these scoundrels are trying to defend the indefensible, butt it blowed-up in their guilty faces!

original Good Job!  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2.10  Greg Jones  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.6    4 weeks ago
"I ignored your post since you refuse to acknowledge any wrongdoing by Trump."

Meaning you can't handle the truth. jrSmiley_46_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2.11  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1.2.9    4 weeks ago

"What kind of citizen misleads their countrymen spreading false viral videos to make their own President look weak and confused?" 

An honest and patriotic one. Because he is terribly weak and confused and everyone knows it. The collection of numerous videos provides ample evidence of unfitness

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.12  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1.2.9    4 weeks ago
What kind of citizen misleads their countrymen spreading false viral videos to make their own President look weak and confused?

Maybe the same kind of partisan folks who swallowed and supported lies about Russian conspiracies and collusion, those who pushed some lies about mythical pee tapes and have pretended Hunter and the President's brother did nothing wrong by selling Joe Biden.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.13  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2.10    4 weeks ago

That's quite mature like your fellow rwnj's.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.14  Tessylo  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.4    4 weeks ago

He doesn't know what he's talking about so you're out of luck.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.15  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.8    4 weeks ago

Trump's important trials (those of President Trump rather than private citizen Trump) have been successfully derailed and will likely not take place before the election.   Thus the electorate is denied knowing the legal truth regarding his behavior as PotUS.   I would expect him to be found guilty in all three (Jan 6, GA election interference, and classified docs obstruction).   

This is a serious travesty of justice.   We do not have the legal truth and, if Trump is reelected, we never will.  That will mean that Trump will have set a permanent precedent of what a PotUS can get away with.   Horrible for the nation.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.16  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.8    4 weeks ago

It will not be overturned.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.17  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2.10    4 weeks ago

Meaning what I wrote:   I am not going to deal with rants when the question I asked was ignored.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

An Ecuadorian migrant was arrested Tuesday  for allegedly sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl in a secluded part of a vast Queens park , according to sources.

The migrant, who sources believe entered the country in 2021, was arrested after he allegedly held the girl and a 13-year-old boy at knifepoint with a “machete-style” blade before  carrying out his sickening, broad-daylight act inside Kissena Park  on Thursday afternoon.

The arrest comes after the NYPD blasted out images and footage of the young man they were looking for on Monday night. The department was also offering a $10,000 award for information leading to an arrest.

He was recognized from the wanted flyers by other residents living in the same Queens shelter, who then called the cops.

The suspect approached the two teens and forced them into a secluded area of the Flushing Meadows park. He then tied their wrists with shoelaces before he molested the girl, NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny previously said.

Migrant arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting 13-year-old girl in NYC park (nypost.com)

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    4 weeks ago
migrant was arrested Tuesday  for allegedly sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl

meh, all he has to do is claim he's a evangelical pastor and he'll be forgiven with no legal ramifications...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @2.1    4 weeks ago

Like an associate of #34 who admitted to molesting a 12 year old girl for four years?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.2  bugsy  replied to  devangelical @2.1    4 weeks ago

Or he is the president and all he did was take a shower with her.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.3  devangelical  replied to  bugsy @2.1.2    4 weeks ago

gee, according to maga, I thought all sex that happens before the election doesn't count...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
2.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @2.1    4 weeks ago
meh, all he has to do is claim he's a evangelical pastor

Maybe his Public Defender will be as smart as you.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @2.1    4 weeks ago
meh, all he has to do is claim he's a evangelical pastor and he'll be forgiven with no legal ramifications...

Meh, all he has to do is just claim he is here for asylum and to make a better life for himself while fleeing tyranny in his home country, and maybe some do-good leftist organization will arrange his bond.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    4 weeks ago
Migrant arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting 13-year-old girl in NYC park (nypost.com)

Trump is a migrant now? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @2.2    4 weeks ago
Trump is a migrant now? 

Never was.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

House Republicans are demanding answers after an FBI counterterrorism sting in three major US cities  reportedly rolled up eight Tajik nationals  who’d crossed the US Southwest Border and were planning a terrorist bombing.

In a new letter, House Homeland Security Committee Mark Green and several subcommittee leaders are demanding that Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of Homeland Security, disclose whether border agencies could have known of terrorism connections when the Tajik Eight first crossed, and how those agencies handled the immigrants after their releases through to the moment the FBI alerted them about plot.

House committee demands answer on eight Tajik border crossers arrested for terror plot (nypost.com)

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

Nicolle Wallace⁩: “There’s a growing & insidious trend in right-wing media … to take highly misleading & selectively edited videos of Pres. Biden … and use those videos to spread messages virally to cast doubt on Pres. Biden’s fitness for office.

Another lie.

Nothing was edited.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 weeks ago

It appeared to every conscious human being that Obama took Biden and guided him off the stage, never taking his hand off of Biden. 

Talk about obvious, stupid, pathetic lies.  If that is what you are seeing, then you are a simpleton who doesn’t recognize that you are only seeing events in the way you want them to be seen, rather than how they obviously are.  It happens 24/7 with Biden haters.  Like when Joe isn’t fitting the sleepy and confused narrative they crave, they say he must be on stimulants.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1    4 weeks ago

Actually, it is a fact.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.1    4 weeks ago

You need a dictionary, apparently.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.2    4 weeks ago

All that is required is one's own eyes.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1    4 weeks ago
Talk about obvious, stupid, pathetic lies.

 Watch the video again and see if he takes his hand off. We will wait.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.4    4 weeks ago

Was he holding Biden up? LOL. What does Obama putting his hand on Bidens back have to do with anything sane people should care about ? 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.6  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.5    4 weeks ago

Nothing. It is the same thing you could witness in any workplace, restaurant, park, gym, etc without ever thinking anything other than “those two know each other as friends”.[]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.6    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.5    4 weeks ago

Vic was basically being called a liar fore saying Obama never took his hand away. The record was set straight

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.8    4 weeks ago

Basically, that is all I said about the video. The focus was on the statement made by the WH press secretary.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.10  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.7    4 weeks ago

It’s the narrative that is fake.  Ridiculously fake.  If Obama shook Joe’s hand you’d claim he was helping Joe up after he tripped over his shoelaces.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.10    4 weeks ago
It’s the narrative that is fake.

That is not what she said. I have here quote up there.

She said the video is fake.

The video is real. That is the fact which some here will refuse to accept.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.12  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.11    4 weeks ago

Deceptive video editing is occurring as often as his haters can manage to do it.  This is just one of many existing instances, and way more instances to come.  Careful what you wish for, as this is something that can be used on Trump just as easily.  Trump craves the camera and is constantly putting himself in vulnerable positions.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.12    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.14  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.12    4 weeks ago

The left has really hit rock bottom when it calls unedited video, deceptive, and equates it to this silliness. The left’s  war on reality continues.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.15  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.12    4 weeks ago

Deflection..........nice

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.16  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.13    4 weeks ago
That's exactly how he does Putin and Johnson

junior and eric...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.17  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.8    4 weeks ago

He's been calling everyone else a liar

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.1.18  JBB  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.17    4 weeks ago

It is called a "Double Reverse Orwell MAGA Orwellinanism"...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 weeks ago

News reporter in North Korea:

There’s a growing & insidious trend in reactionary media … to take highly misleading & selectively edited videos of our beloved dear leader … and use those videos to spread messages virally to cast doubt  on his perfect physique, his ability to jump over buildings and his ability to run faster than a cheetah. 

same mindset

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2    4 weeks ago

George Orwell warned us.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 weeks ago

Pretty remarkable. Instead of simply playing the video uninterrupted, Wallace uses footage that cuts away from Biden as he’s standing frozen for several seconds and then skips the part where Obama grabs his hand to walk off stage.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.3    4 weeks ago

They always seem to project what they do onto others.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.1    4 weeks ago

Projection

Today's gqp

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    4 weeks ago

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”  1984

To refute the unedited video we've seen from multiple different angles, Olga is posting an edited video with 10 cuts in 48 seconds to claim that the unedited raw footage is a lie. That is some next level gaslighting

what the Biden administration is doing is as bad and dishonest as anything the trump administration done.  There’s no difference in integrity between the two.

 If trump were to stoop to Biden’s level, he should just claim every piece of video, any audio, any photo, that is used as as evidence against him is a deep fake. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 weeks ago

'The party told you t reject the evidence of your eye and ears.  I was their final, most essential command.'

jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

The Projection.

What today's gqp should be called.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 weeks ago
JohnRJohnson
@JRobertJohnson4
Olga's video, edits notwithstanding, indicates quite clearly that Biden was engaging with people in the audience. His only sin was not knowing when to get off the stage. Shame on you people.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 weeks ago

"Olga's" video shows Biden engaging with the audience seconds before he allegedly "froze". 

The right really are shameless liars. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.3    4 weeks ago

Olga's" video shows Biden engaging with the audience seconds before he allegedly "froze". 
 

why you seem to think that discredits anything is beyond me.  That’s how freezing works.  The senior just disengages from what they are doing and stops reacting.  

do you think the claim is that Biden is always frozen? Or that the freezing lasts for hours?

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
5.3.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.3.1    4 weeks ago
do you think the claim is that Biden is always frozen? Or that the freezing lasts for hours?

Fox "news" says the White HZouse Staff must put Biden in a large tow behind microwave every so often, just to defrost him.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.3.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.3.1    4 weeks ago

this is an image of the absolute start of the video the New York Post and other right wing sources put up. Notice the time stamp is at 0:00

800

You say this video was not edited. Of course it was edited, to leave out the why of Biden was standing there looking out at the audience. 

Bidens biggest problem is that he stiff, he is stiff walking and he is stiff standing still, so to you he looks "frozen". Its all bullshit. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.3.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.3.3    4 weeks ago

Having a start point is not editing. It’s a continuous shot. 

 The video you posted contains 10 edits to cut the shots that make Biden look bad. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.3.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Igknorantzruls @5.3.2    4 weeks ago
Fox "news" says the White HZouse Staff must put Biden in a large tow behind microwave every so often, just to defrost him.

I don't believe that is true but it might not be a bad idea.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.3.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.3.3    4 weeks ago

deo the New York Post and other right wing sources put up.

The New York Post's article is based on, and contains a link to,   the unedited video shot and posted by a reporter for The Hollywood Reporter. That's the conspiracy. The post linked to video from a reporter for a left wing outlet and didn't edit it. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.3.7  Tessylo  replied to  Igknorantzruls @5.3.2    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.3.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.3.4    4 weeks ago
Having a start point is not editing. It’s a continuous shot. 

LOL.

the video is longer than what they are showing, and was clipped to start at a certain precise moment. A moment that would make Biden look bad. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.3.9  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @5.3.8    4 weeks ago

definition of edit - Cambridhe English dictionary

to make  changes  to a  text  or  movie deciding   what will be  removed  and what will be  kept  in , in  order  to  prepare  it for being  printed  or  shown :

Was something removed from the original compared to what the NY Post posted on twitter?

YES. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 weeks ago

Direct us to the part of your video that shows what Biden was doing in the seconds leading up to this so called "freezing".  Oops, there is no such footage in your video. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.4.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4    4 weeks ago
what Biden was doing in the seconds leading up to this so called "freezing". 

He waived to the crowd and then froze and stared blankly until Obama grabbed him by the wrist and moved him off stage. That is what the unedited videos (of which there are more than one) show.  

Do you not grasp what freezing is? That he was doing something when it occurred is an integral element of it.  Freezing is  detaching  from reality while engaged in an activity. Like waving at the crowd and suddenly disengaging and not reacting to what's around him. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.4.1    4 weeks ago

You are imagining things. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.4.1    4 weeks ago

Why does the video that purports to be Biden "freezing" start exactly at the moment he "freezes" and not a second before ? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.4.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.2    4 weeks ago
You are imagining things. 

"He waived to the crowd and then froze and stared blankly until Obama grabbed him by the wrist and moved him off stage. "

What part of that isn't supported by the unedited videos? 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.3    4 weeks ago

He wasn't frozen the second before?  Who cares, they didn't claim he was frozen a second before.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.4.5    4 weeks ago

Why was the New York Post afraid to start the video BEFORE he allegedly froze. 

The fact that the video only starts after he "froze" is completely suspicious.  And yes, that is editing. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.6    4 weeks ago

   How does showing him normal change the fact that he froze?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.3    4 weeks ago

He was normal, than he froze.  Not sure what you are struggling with

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.4.7    4 weeks ago

It shows that he didnt freeze. He was standing there taking in the applause. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.10  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.9    4 weeks ago

Correct, then he froze.  Deer in the headlights comes to mind.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
5.4.11  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.4.5    4 weeks ago
"He wasn't frozen    Who cares, they didn't claim he was"

These words all come from the same post and remain in the order, YOU posted, but they might slightly change the meaning when context is omitted, asz you certainly need, to admitted.

When editing, as is leaving out parts of what happened, what happened, is not the same, nor will it be interpreted the same, so it becomes an inaccurate depiction, also called FICTION, and is a DERELICTION, of ones duty as a pol or a journalist to not accurately present what really actually did happen to happen.

"He wasn't frozen the second before?  Who cares, they didn't claim he was frozen a second before."

Yea, nothing to do bout nothin, yet again.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.12  Right Down the Center  replied to  Igknorantzruls @5.4.11    4 weeks ago

Here is a video with the seconds before.  He froze and was staring into space until Obama woke him from his trance.  Try and spin it as you will but if Trump did the same exact thing the left would be all over it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.4.13  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.9    4 weeks ago

He waived, then he froze, then Obama grabbed him the by the wrist.

that he was acting “normally” before freezing is not relevant. It’s understood he was, otherwise he couldn’t freeze.   No one is claiming he was frozen for the duration of the event. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.4.14  Sean Treacy  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.4.12    4 weeks ago

That’s an unedited  video appearing in right wing media. I’m sure the apologies will start any second. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.15  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.4.13    4 weeks ago
that he was acting “normally” before freezing is not relevant. It’s understood he was, otherwise he couldn’t freeze.   No one is claiming he was frozen for the duration of the event. 

The deflecting attempt is amusing

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.16  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.4.14    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_28_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.17  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.4.12    4 weeks ago

He stands there still and stiff for 7 seconds before Obama grabs him .  To MAGA nutjobs this constitutes "freezing " . To normal people it shows him taking in the applause. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
5.4.18  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.17    4 weeks ago

Keep trying to convince people of that.  While you are at it try to convince them that  if Trump did the exact same thing your response would be the same

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
5.4.19  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.4.12    4 weeks ago

I get it, the guy is OLD and slower than he once was, and has been prone to gaff's and misspeaking his whole career. His body is old and stiff, and he comes off as old, and stiff.

I just see the 'right' make it appear, purposely, far worse than it is. It is a concern, as admitted by Dems as well, but compared to Trump, there is not about any amount of frozen that many could and would tolerate, as Trump is a true THREAT to our country !   Biden could be like Brendon Brandon Frasier, and thaw out from the ice age, and he would still be a cooler choice than Trump !  it could be a Pay Per View EXTRAVAGANZA  

 Encino Man  VS  Failed Casino Man

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.4.20  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.2    3 weeks ago

more like making shit up

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

Schumer prepares for yet another vote on nationally protecting abortion rights.

We must be about 5 months from a Presidential election!

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
7  Right Down the Center    4 weeks ago

I would not take   Karine Jean-Pierres job for the world.  Something about selling my soul bothers me

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
8  JBB    4 weeks ago

The world is both angry about and laughing at MAGA Madness that is blamed for the dishonest players noe indulging in such dirty un-American political tricks like this. Falsely edited misreported deep fake viral videos the gop and Fox News are spreading are backfiring in their no good low down lying disreputable faces!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @8    4 weeks ago

Falsely edited misreported deep fake viral videos

this is why KJP  is willing to tell such brazen lies . There’s an audience that swallows it whole.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
8.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  JBB @8    4 weeks ago
Falsely edited misreported deep fake viral videos the gop and Fox News are spreading are backfiring in their no good low down lying disreputable faces!

Remember the "I will be a dictator" videos the left showed edited and still accuses Trump about?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
9  Greg Jones    4 weeks ago

To all the Biden ass kissers....there are too many videos of Biden's frailty and weakness and stiffly standing staring into space for it to be considered healthy and normal. He's been a total disaster for the nation, has become our national disgrace and embarrassment, and is not fit to be president.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
9.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Greg Jones @9    4 weeks ago
videos of Biden's frailty and weakness and stiffly standing staring into space for it to be considered healthy and normal.

Hey, Viagra affects everyone uniquely, asz sum times all the blood rushes to the wrong head, butt Trump knows how to get it done, and is lookin forward to some pria-prism prison FUn, and knot hard to imagine, cuz, Y woodn't he...?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @9    3 weeks ago

To all the mushroom suckers  .....the projection is palpable

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
10  Thomas    4 weeks ago
This is exactly what George Orwell tried to warn us about.

[No.] [] It is your commentary.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
11  Greg Jones    4 weeks ago

Here's the deal folks. Joe Biden is old and slow and shuffling and slurring. He projects nothing but confusion and weakness which are disastrous in someone who is supposed to be the leader of the free world. The American electorate is becoming appalled by this image and is increasingly rejecting his reelection. 

It is the duty of every American patriot who believes in preserving our representative form of democracy to point out Biden's unfitness for office by bringing up his shortcomings and lies at every opportunity. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @11    4 weeks ago

You bring up his shortcomings while ignoring and defending those of Trump.   There is no credibility in such an approach.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @11.1    4 weeks ago

Your anti-Trump comments far outnumber your anti-Biden ones. Does that mean YOU are ignoring Biden's shortcomings, as you accuse others of doing with Trump?

Or is it just 'different'?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.1    4 weeks ago

It means that I find far more things wrong with Trump than I do of Biden.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.2    4 weeks ago

Can you fathom even the IDEA that others may find more fault with Biden than Trump?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.4  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.3    4 weeks ago

A stupid question given the number of people saying they will vote for Trump.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.4    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.4    4 weeks ago
A stupid question given the number of people saying they will vote for Trump.

the number of people who say they will vote for Trump (or Biden) has absolutely nothing--nothing at ALL--to do with the question.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
11.1.7  Greg Jones  replied to  TᵢG @11.1    3 weeks ago

Why would I bring up some alleged shortcomings of Trump? 

That's your job. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
11.1.8  Greg Jones  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.4    3 weeks ago

That should tell you something. Can millions of rational and sane American citizens be wrong?

Have you ever considered the possibility your opinions are politically biased and blindly partisan?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @11.1.7    3 weeks ago

That was definitely an lol moment for me

'alleged shortcomings'

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @11.1.8    3 weeks ago

Given I dislike (heavily) both political parties, my positions are not partisan by definition.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.11  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @11.1.7    3 weeks ago
Why would I bring up some alleged shortcomings of Trump? 

You should seriously consider them because that is what is required to be objective.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.12  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.6    3 weeks ago

The fact that I recognize that there are tens of millions of people who intend to vote for Trump means, by definition, that I "fathom the idea" that others may find more fault with Biden than Trump.

That fact is one of the major problems with the electorate today.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.12    3 weeks ago
The fact that I recognize that there are tens of millions of people who intend to vote for Trump means, by definition, that I "fathom the idea" that others may find more fault with Biden than Trump.

I don't see it reflected in your posts.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @11.1.8    3 weeks ago
Can millions of rational and sane American citizens be wrong?

Are you aware of the argumentum ad populum fallacy?   

Tens of millions of Americans believe the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.    Does that mean they are correct?

In the 17th century and earlier, people believed the Earth was the center of the universe.

Yeah, Greg, it is entirely possible that millions of rational and sane Americans can be wrong about Trump.    This is easily accomplished with confirmation bias.   Especially when a cultish environment has formed.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
11.1.15  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.13    3 weeks ago

You then should be embarrassed.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.16  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.15    3 weeks ago

Embarrassed about being right!?!

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
11.1.17  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Greg Jones @11.1.8    3 weeks ago
Have you ever considered the possibility your opinions are politically biased and blindly partisan?

Hey Greg, ALL of US contain [political bias], we just can't seem to afford to keep up with Trump $135,000.00 per to buy ass, but you throw in the $Ninety or so MILLION for Carol , and the art of the deal, is slightly out of somes price range. We are all Partisan asz well, and some Partidaughters, sometimes you can even tell. 

Now i am admittedly a very biased Independent, and on occasion can see my partisanship sail on through, so, how about you ? Cause i don't see, or agree, that TiGs' opines are too inclined to show much bias, as hes too logical and an in depth thinker with introspect, to not critically think about that which he wishes to share and expose, as you deflect, and he wanted NH over Biden, so he being partisan would not fit, but i'll let him, if he should so choose, show you another argumeant for you to lose, as between you too , and i'll battle with N E 1, but since he and i are usally on the same page, it is more fun, and i need not have to think so much as it might send me in to a rage, i just wish i knew what book that page was on again, and also

i rarely know when to say when.... 

one more thing or two, when are Trumpers in the millions, rational anD sane, unless you take them, and put them IRR and IN

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  Igknorantzruls @11.1.17    3 weeks ago

no, no, some people claim to be nonpartisan and to do that, they would need to be free of biases.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
11.1.19  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.18    3 weeks ago

we ALL have some biases 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.20  Texan1211  replied to  Igknorantzruls @11.1.19    3 weeks ago

So no one can be truly nonpartisan?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
11.1.21  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @11.1.10    3 weeks ago

Thank you for saying my positions are not partisan

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.1.22  Texan1211  replied to  Right Down the Center @11.1.21    3 weeks ago
Thank you for saying my positions are not partisan

Well, only if you meant it when you said you won't vote for one of the two clowns.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.1.23  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.20    3 weeks ago
"So no one can be truly nonpartisan?"

That depends on what the issue is.  For example, I'm quite capable of being non-partisan when it comes to American politics, although how they might affect me or my loved ones personally might have some influence.  However, when it comes to Israel I'm partisan as hell and I'm not embarrassed by it. 

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
11.1.24  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.20    3 weeks ago

my biases won't allow me to view this question in a non partisan way, but i will say, we All have biases, as we cannot help it. Our social environments shape US and will instill some bias in us all

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
11.1.25  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11.1.23    3 weeks ago
t comes to Israel I'm partisan as hell and I'm not embarrassed by it.

Nor should you be, as it is something held dear to you, and since I am not well read on the events there, I was a tad ambiguous the other evening, and not stated disrespectfully, as I believe Thomas was correct in the overall motive for the wordings, seemed stated to push one to take a side, which I cannot without further knowledge, currently do in good faith. But I do respect your passion for 'your' people, as I was part of my fathers significant others Jewish celebrations, and can appreciate your perspective.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.1.26  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Igknorantzruls @11.1.25    3 weeks ago

My perspective is also molded by personal Israel experiences that I have often related on this site, which is one of the reasons I give little credence to those whose opinions about Israel are stated with no personal experience in or about Israel.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12  author  Vic Eldred    3 weeks ago

 
 

Who is online












Sparty On


20 visitors