╌>

The Dishonorable Attack on the Alitos

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  4 weeks ago  •  104 comments

By:   Peggy Noonan, the WSJ

The Dishonorable Attack on the Alitos
Ms. Windsor dishonestly presented herself as a conservative Christian. She goaded and baited the Alitos, hoping to get them to say extreme and stupid things, which she would later disseminate on social media.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


I suppose this is about being an honorable combatant in the middle of a culture war, which entails seeing the humanity of your perceived foe and, in the seeing of it, preserving your own.

The story, which you’ve already heard, is that a left-wing activist who calls herself an “advocacy journalist” went to the June 3 dinner of the Supreme Court Historical Society, a 50-year-old organization whose declared mission is to unearth and preserve the court’s history. During what appears to have been the drinks portion of the evening the activist, called Lauren Windsor, secretly taped private conversations with Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Alito’s wife, Martha-Ann. Ms. Windsor dishonestly presented herself as a conservative Christian. She goaded and baited the Alitos, hoping to get them to say extreme and stupid things, which she would later disseminate on social media.


Mrs. Alito, as appears to be her way—she is commonly described by friends as “a pistol”—said some spirited things. She has been under siege. Her husband wrote the  Dobbs  decision; she is by extension a target of hatred; she has been verbally confronted in her neighborhood and accused of inappropriate flag flying. Half the accusation—that after words with a neighbor she flew the American flag upside-down—was legitimate. It was a weird choice for the spouse of a justice in a time of tension. The other half—that the old Appeal to Heaven flag was flown at her vacation home, secretly signaling allegiance with the rioters on Jan. 6—was absurd. People on 1/6 carried Bibles and Bic pens too. Should we ban them? Slime those who use them?

The tone of the edited six-minute tape of the conversation with Mrs. Alito is at variance with news reports. Ms. Windsor comes across as a pushy and vaguely hysterical fangirl meeting an idol. Clearly, she was acting out her idea of a Christian and conservative, which is a revved-up nut. Mrs. Alito’s mistake was responding in an egalitarian manner and not breezing past the nut with a quick, false smile.

Ms. Windsor introduces herself: “I’m a huge fan of your husband, and everything you’re going through, I just wanna tell you—”

“It’s OK, it’s OK,” Mrs. Alito says.

Ms. Windsor: “It’s not OK, though! It’s not OK!” Mrs. Alito offers a vow: “If they come back to me, I’ll get them. I’m gonna be liberated and I’m gonna get them.”

Ms. Windsor perks up. A threat! “What do you mean by ‘they’?”

Mrs. Alito answers: “The media.” The press made fun of her from the day she arrived in Washington, at the sparky confirmation hearings for her husband. She implies that when all this is over she’ll be giving them a piece of her mind. Everyone in Washington has this fantasy.

Ms. Windsor says the Appeal to Heaven flag flap was nonsense, and begins to swear excitedly. “Right,” says Mrs. Alito. “But, like, I have the same flag!” Ms. Windsor says. “Yes, I know,” says Mrs. Alito.

“But a lot of people fly that f—flag!” Ms. Windsor says. Mrs. Alito, in what sounds to my ears like a comforting tone: “Don’t worry about it, baby.”

Ms. Windsor says Mrs. Alito is being persecuted as “a convenient stand-in for anybody who’s religious.” Again Mrs. Alito says it will be OK—she’s German and tough. “You come after, me I’m gonna give it back to you.” This part had a “Real Housewives” flavor. “Don’t worry about it.” Mrs. Alito says, read Psalm 27.

Ms. Windsor changes tack, quoting something she had said to Justice Alito. “So I met him last year at this dinner. And I said to him, like, ‘This country is so polarized, how do we repair that rift?’ And he was like, ‘I don’t know, I don’t know, that’s not our role.’ And I told him this year, I’m like, ‘You know for the past year I remembered our conversation and I looked at what happened to you and your wife, and I’m like ‘How is there any negotiating with the radical left?’ ”

Mrs. Alito agrees there isn’t. “There’s not!,” says Mrs. Windsor. “You cannot negotiate with the radical left!” “You have to just win!”

It’s like Sean Hannity on meth.

Ms. Windsor: “No, but you have to win! And if we want to take this country back to, like, a godly place, to a moral place, that means that we actually have to just—”

By now Mrs. Alito is all in, blowing off steam. She’d like to put a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag up across from a pride flag. “Oh, please don’t put up a flag,” her husband says, and she won’t, but after he leaves the court, “I’m putting it up and I’m gonna send them a message every day. Maybe every week I’ll be changing the flags. They’ll be all kinds!”

One believes her.

The edited tapes made front-page news, which was odd in a mainstream media that regularly and rightly scores the right-wing secret-sting-tape-maker James O’Keefe for deceptive reporting.

As to the contents of the Roberts and Justice Alito tapes, the chief justice didn’t take any bait or any nonsense. Of making America more godly, he said, “Would you want me to be in charge of putting the nation on a more moral path? That’s for people we elect. That’s not for lawyers. . . . It’s our job to decide the cases the best we can.”

Justice Alito gave Ms. Windsor more patience, but I agreed with the New York Post editorial that he seemed like someone gently trying to shake off a political obsessive. He agreed that polarization is real, and that for it to end, “one side or the other is going to win. I don’t know. I mean, there can be a way of working—a way of living together peacefully. But it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised.” Still, the court can’t solve polarization. “We have a very defined role, and we need to do what we’re supposed to do.”

The Alitos and Chief Justice Roberts didn’t do or say anything wrong. But there was something quite inhuman in what the left-wing activist did. She treated human beings as if they were mere means to her end. She acted out admiration to perform reputational harm. She presented herself falsely to inflict damage. That the content she produced was disseminated by honest grown-up journalists is to their discredit.

She claims to oppose polarization but fans it, further alienating those who already lack trust in institutions like the court and professionals like journalists. She presents another warning to those who hold or are adjacent to high office: You can’t assume good faith on the part of fellow citizens who seek you out.

More than that, it is deeply Stalinist. In Stalin’s time private life was dead, and private comments too. Neighbor spied on neighbor and reported back subversive comments to the Central Committee. People became spies, rooting out ideological error.

And, if you’re serious, what does it even get you? You persuade nobody. Your ideological friends like it that you owned the cons. Your foes are hardened. You get attention for yourself. So what? You’ll always be the person who got attention that way.


B3-BS053_noonan_AM_20180912120458.jpg  
Peggy Noonan

The WSJ


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

Reporters don't lie about who they are.

Btw there was nothing wrong with anything Alito said in his private cocktail conversation.

The Windsor playbook only impresses the radicals on the left. Left wing media uses people like her to do the things they don't want to dirty their hands with.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago

Dishonorable attack on the Alitos?

Mrs. Alito is one hateful and racist bitch.  Sounds like she has a lot of influence on Mr., just like Ginny, I think we all know who wears the pants in these bought and paid for judges households.  

Why haven't he and Thomas recused themselves from 1/6 - they were a part of it.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    4 weeks ago

The moral for her progressive neighbor is don't use a "pride flag" to taunt your neighbor.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    4 weeks ago

Vergogna

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    4 weeks ago
I think we all know who wears the pants

I think we all know that who does is irrelevant.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    4 weeks ago

don't use a "pride flag" to taunt your neighbor.

Flying a flag right side up amounts to taunting your neighbor?  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.4    4 weeks ago

It was a non-violent reaction.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.1.6  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.5    4 weeks ago

Flying a pride flag is not taunting.  You know this.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.7  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.6    4 weeks ago

Come on.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1.1.8  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.7    4 weeks ago

Do you think pride flags should be publicly outlawed?  Perhaps you should move to Iran where your feelings would fit right in.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1.1.4    4 weeks ago

In rwnj world

Look what we made the Alitos do.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.9    4 weeks ago
Look what we made the Alitos do.

What was that?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago
hoping to get them to say extreme and stupid things

mission accomplished...

next up, a fat rwnj, owned lock stock and barrel by the federalists, and his insurrectionist sasquatch wife ...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.2    4 weeks ago

It didn't take much 'goading or baiting' did it?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.2    4 weeks ago

that bitch fits right in with the revenge and retribution gang

when hubby is done with all that nonsense of the Supreme Court - she is big on getting revenge

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.2    4 weeks ago

Is Harlan Crow a federalist?  Or just one who owns clarence?

He has a whole wing in his home dedicated to Nazi memorabilia

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.2    4 weeks ago
that bitch

Very good.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.2.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.3    4 weeks ago
He has a whole wing in his home dedicated to Nazi memorabilia

A historical collection worthy of a museum.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.4    4 weeks ago

you left out hateful and racist and vengeful

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.7  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.6    4 weeks ago

I can't keep up with you.

It has been another rousing response from the left.

The nation's finest speech writer stands a bit taller today.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.8  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.7    4 weeks ago

There's nothing honorable about Alito - bought and paid for

Poor Peggy, she's lost it and gone delusional and demented like much of today's gqp

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago
Reporters don't lie about who they are.

= oh no, somebody stole a play out of our playbook...

after 50+ years, when will rwnj's grasp the concept of recorded audio and video, especially in this day and age...

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
1.4  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago
Reporters don't lie about who they are.

Who is James O'Keefe?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.4.1  JBB  replied to  Hallux @1.4    4 weeks ago

That no good lying fake ass scumbag from Project Veritas?

The one it turned out all his stories were complete bullshit?

That Jame O'Keefe?

The one whose lies the MAGA insisted were 100% True Lies?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2  Sparty On    4 weeks ago

Folks like “Ms” Windsor have no honor.    Have no shame.    Like other fundamentalist before them they push their narrative at all costs.

They are the dregs of society.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2    4 weeks ago

I wonder if she'll join NT.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    4 weeks ago

Probably already here.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.1    4 weeks ago

LMAO!

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.3  Snuffy  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    4 weeks ago

Ooooo, maybe someone will start a pool and we can guess who she is...  Or maybe a drinking game...  Such fun!!!  Almost as much fun as the normal 'Tastes Great / Less Filling' arguments we get over politics here.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.3    4 weeks ago

It would be a challenge.

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
2.1.5  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    4 weeks ago
It would be a challenge.

Still working on a full set?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sparty On @2    4 weeks ago

ms. Windsor is the actual zealot, willing to do anything because she’s convinced her own righteousness justifies it. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2    4 weeks ago

As William F Buckley once warned the FBI's W Mark Felt (not knowing that he was "Deep throat") acting out of righteousness can be a slippery slope.

What one person may consider righteous may be much different than what another considers righteous. It is best that we all follow a decent standard of conduct.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2    4 weeks ago

Yep, a radical fundamentalist through and through.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.1    4 weeks ago

'It is best that we all follow a decent standard of conduct.'

When will the rwnjs do so?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.3    4 weeks ago
When will the rwnjs do so?

Where are they?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2    4 weeks ago

James O Keefe did this sort of thing from the right for over 10 years. 

He was even an official Fox News contributor for part of that time. 

Spare us the new found outrage. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.6  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.5    4 weeks ago

Media Buzz?  Thank Fox News for having a liberal on the panel.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.5    4 weeks ago

 The 'right' don't like it when we use some of their tactics do they?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.8  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.5    4 weeks ago
Spare us the new found outrage. 

Nothing new about it but get used to it.    It’ll be getting called out regularly.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.5    4 weeks ago

Sure. Just point me to your posts defending okeefe or favorable coverage of his work from the MSM…

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    4 weeks ago

The war on the Supreme Court is out of control.  It’s all about laying the ground work for court packing,  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    4 weeks ago

Yes, I miss those days of the "activist" courts, when the MSM treated the Court with the utmost respect.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    4 weeks ago
Court with the utmost respect.

That was before the court was packed with right wing extremists. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.1    4 weeks ago

"Right wing extremists" must be your little euphemism for strict Constructionists.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.1    4 weeks ago

Bought and paid for

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.1    4 weeks ago

Elections have consequences.

- Barack Obama 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.3    4 weeks ago

By whom and for what?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.2    4 weeks ago

They are just pouting because they don’t “win” every decision.  If the court had a progressive 6-3 majority and progressive  justices acted the exact same way as Alito, they’d be perfectly happy.  There is zero principle involved. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.6    4 weeks ago

There is zero principle involved with the right wing bought and paid for 'justices'

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.6    4 weeks ago

Bazinga!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.9  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.6    4 weeks ago
 There is zero principle involved. 

There is no room for principles when building a utopia.  It's kind of like making an omelet.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.9    4 weeks ago

rwnjs have zero principles to begin with and zero standards

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.11  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.10    4 weeks ago

That settles that.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.12  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.1    4 weeks ago

The Court is not packed with right wing extremists.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
3.1.13  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.12    4 weeks ago
he Court is not packed with right wing extremists.

what the fudge

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.14  Texan1211  replied to  Igknorantzruls @3.1.13    4 weeks ago

what does fudge have to do with it?

I do like fudge, though!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    4 weeks ago

The war ON the supreme court?

WOW!!

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
3.3  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    4 weeks ago
It’s all about laying the ground work for court packing

Psst ... it's been packed unless you are of the school of thought that 6 is a lower number than 3.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.3.1  Texan1211  replied to  Hallux @3.3    4 weeks ago

The court is not packed.

That's ridiculous.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hallux @3.3    4 weeks ago

now you are redefining terms to make an argument?  
very orwellian of you. 

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
3.3.3  Hallux  replied to  Texan1211 @3.3.1    4 weeks ago

Cut the verbal diarrhea, if SCOTUS was 6-3 in favor of democrats you'd be whining non-stop.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.3.4  Texan1211  replied to  Hallux @3.3.3    4 weeks ago

wow.

I had no idea you had esp and are clairvoyant now 

perhaps one day the visions will be correct when they come to you.

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
3.3.5  Hallux  replied to  Texan1211 @3.3.4    4 weeks ago

Now you know, damn you were easy to teach. My thanks to all the commies who taught/indoctrinated you.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    4 weeks ago

Peggy Noonan, 73,  is due for a cognitive test . 

Mrs Alito, at best, comes off as a MAGA wannabe on those audios. Her comments are not remotely soothing to people who expect an unbiased judiciary. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4    4 weeks ago

So, you called two people names.

Let us know when you can counter Ms Noonan's argument.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    4 weeks ago

I heard the audio of what the Alitos said. That is the counter argument. 

The only "defense" of them is "free speech". 

Where is objectivity on the Court ? 

Noonan's ridiculous idea that these secret tapes represent "Stalinism" is embarrassing. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    4 weeks ago

She questioned the integrity of somebody who lies about who they are and tries to bait someone into saying something.

It is too bad I have to spell out something so obvious.

So, is Ms Noonan right or wrong?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    4 weeks ago

She is right as in rwnj

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
4.1.4  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    4 weeks ago
So, is Ms Noonan right or wrong?

She is trying to be relevant and perhaps save her job. The WSJ has been sacking a lot of reporters/columnists lately.

As to being "right or wrong", only a partisan can tell for sure.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @4.1.4    4 weeks ago

Gee, I guess there is an explanation for everything.

Some believe that Jack the Ripper simply disliked women debasing themselves as whores.

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
4.1.6  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.5    4 weeks ago

Jack the Ripper was miffed that Patty the Pathologist dumped him.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.7  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @4.1.6    4 weeks ago

I knew there had to be an explanation.

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
4.1.8  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.7    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @4    4 weeks ago

lol … yes, she committed the ultimate sin.    Speaking against the TDS ridden.

Shame on Peggy ….. bad Peggy ….

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4    4 weeks ago

Who could possibly care what ms. Alito comes off as? Women aren’t their husband's property and have their own opinions.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.4  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @4    4 weeks ago

Amazingly enough, many Americans stay well informed and already know that Mrs. Alito is not a part of the judiciary in any way.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.4.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Texan1211 @4.4    4 weeks ago

Mrs. Alito is not a part of the judiciary in any way.

She serves a very important position - scapegoats are useful for throwing under buses when public image is at risk.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.4.2  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.4.1    4 weeks ago

That's just silly.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.4.3  Ronin2  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.4.1    4 weeks ago

Hunter had better hope not.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5  JBB    4 weeks ago

Alitos showed their asses. They were dirty and stunk up the place...

Dumb and mean is a bad hand. The Alitos bet it all on Trump Cards!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @5    4 weeks ago

Their obviously biased dirty and prejudiced and hateful asses.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @5    4 weeks ago

More name calling.

I know somebody who thinks that is a form of "expression."

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2    4 weeks ago

Better than lying. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.1    4 weeks ago

The only one who lied was the "activist" reporter.

So, you are not going to answer the question?

Have a good day.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.2    4 weeks ago

Lying goes on from the right here every single day. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.3    4 weeks ago

My patience is wearing thin on you calling me a liar.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.2.5  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.4    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.4    4 weeks ago

Big deal

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.4    4 weeks ago

then stop it

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2.8  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.3    4 weeks ago

It has to offset all the lying from the left.

Any leftist found those much sought after pee tapes mentioned in the Steele dossier yet?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.2.9  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.3    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.2.10  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.4    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.2.11  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @5.2.10    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.3  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @5    4 weeks ago

Please quote the words said by Justice Alito that have you upset.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
5.3.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Texan1211 @5.3    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.3.2  Texan1211  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @5.3.1    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
5.3.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Texan1211 @5.3.2    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    4 weeks ago

This story was a nothing burger because the secretly taped justices spoke exactly as one would want Supreme Court justices to act.  So the left focuses on a spouse to keep stirring the pot.  It’s all about destroying the court by any means necessary.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @6    4 weeks ago

yeah, but it sure got some LWNJs all worked up!

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1    4 weeks ago

Sad, angry little people.

Very sad, very angry, very small minded …..

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
7  Thrawn 31    4 weeks ago

Alito is a douchebag, what else is new?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1  Texan1211  replied to  Thrawn 31 @7    4 weeks ago

What did Alito do to incur your disdain?

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Freshman Quiet
7.1.1  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1    4 weeks ago

obviously, like you are doing, the Alito Shuffle....

 
 

Who is online




Sparty On


29 visitors