╌>

Dems Accidentally Reveal Their Plan To Destroy The Constitution Ahead of Schedule

  

Category:  Satire

Via:  gregtx  •  9 months ago  •  17 comments

Dems Accidentally Reveal Their Plan To Destroy The Constitution Ahead of Schedule
ALBUQUERQUE, NM — Democrats accidentally let their master plan to utterly destroy the United States Constitution slip out into public slightly ahead of schedule.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


ALBUQUERQUE, NM — Democrats accidentally let their master plan to utterly destroy the United States Constitution slip out into public slightly ahead of schedule.

"Welp, this is embarrassing," said Governor Grisham of New Mexico. "Really jumped the gun on announcing how we would do away with the Bill of Rights. Get it - jumped the gun?? Ha! Anyhow, yeah, that's how we're going to blow the Constitution to pieces. Cat's out of the bag!"

According to sources within the party, the Democrats had planned on giving it another five to ten years before destroying the remains of the Constitution. "It's a little ahead of schedule, but I doubt the sheep fight back," said Governor Newsom of California. "So, yeah -- we are going to use the precedent of suspending civil liberties during a pandemic to suspend Americans' rights for anything we subjectively declare an emergency, rendering all rights subject to the government's whims. Pretty genius, right? Man, COVID was such a godsend for us."

At publishing time, Americans asking if we could please just follow the Constitution had been accused of creating a public health emergency and immediately tossed in jail.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1  seeder  GregTx    9 months ago

512

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  GregTx @1    9 months ago

Why do you bother?

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.1.1  seeder  GregTx  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    9 months ago

With what?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  GregTx @1    9 months ago

More projection.

Yawn

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.2.1  seeder  GregTx  replied to  Tessylo @1.2    9 months ago

From what?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  Texan1211    9 months ago

This satire may be closer to the truth than most sane people would like.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
2.1  Drakkonis  replied to  Texan1211 @2    9 months ago

Definitely. 

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Texan1211 @2    9 months ago

Effective satire always includes a decent amount of truth.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.2    9 months ago

I don't see any truth in this alleged satire.

I see a lot of projection, as usual.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.2    9 months ago
Effective satire always includes a decent amount of truth.

True.

Not enough people are capable of recognizing satire, even when it is clearly marked as such.

This does sound plausible for the left.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.2.3  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    9 months ago
I don't see any truth in this alleged satire.

Sometimes, good satire can be a complicated literary genre that many people have difficulty understanding, because it incorporates truth, wit, sarcasm, comedy, irony. I struggled with it in middle school and high school, but understood in college.

I highly recommend reading the works of Aesop, Chaucer, Shakespeare, Butler, Molière, Benjamin Franklin, Poe, Carroll, Twain, Shaw, O. Henry, Orwell, and so many other satirists in order to appreciate it.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Principal
2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @2    9 months ago
This satire may be closer to the truth than most sane people would like

Unfortunately there are those who haven't been paying enough attention to understand it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.3.1  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.3    9 months ago
Unfortunately there are those who haven't been paying enough attention to understand it.

Yeah, I am not worried about the Biden sycophants, they will deny Joe knew anything no matter what the evidence tells us anyway, so no sense wasting time trying to convince those folks.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.3.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.3    9 months ago

Judging by its latest polling, CNN seems to be coming around. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Principal
2.3.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.3.2    9 months ago

I noticed that.  I've seen a few articles where CNN has been critical of the Biden Dumpster Fire.

 
 
 
A. Macarthur
Professor Guide
2.4  A. Macarthur  replied to  Texan1211 @2    9 months ago

Right! I was thinking that just the other day when I read that there’s a good chance that Trump has one of Khashoggi’s fingers as a souvenir.

We all know many a true word is spoken in jest is spoken in jest, or as plausible satire.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.4.1  Ronin2  replied to  A. Macarthur @2.4    9 months ago

Careful, you will have Democrats and leftists believing it.

Of course many TDS driven leftists are still vainly searching the internet for the Trump "pee tapes". Still denying that the Steele Dossier has been completely disproven as Russian propaganda paid for by the Clinton campaign.

 
 

Who is online




35 visitors