Gov. DeSantis' redistricting map is unconstitutional and must be redrawn, says Florida judge | Florida News | Orlando | Orlando Weekly


Category:  News & Politics

Via:  kavika  •  6 months ago  •  7 comments

By:   Gov. Ron DeSantis (Orlando Weekly)

Gov. DeSantis' redistricting map is unconstitutional and must be redrawn, says Florida judge | Florida News | Orlando | Orlando Weekly
This is a significant victory in the fight for fair representation for Black Floridians.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T

'This is a significant victory in the fight for fair representation for Black Floridians.'

By Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida on Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:22 pm

 A Leon County circuit judge Saturday ruled that a congressional redistricting plan pushed through the Legislature by Gov. Ron DeSantis violated the Florida Constitution and needs to be redrawn.

Circuit Judge J. Lee Marsh sided with voting-rights groups in a lawsuit focused on a North Florida district that in the past elected Black Democrat Al Lawson but was dramatically revamped during the 2022 redistricting process. White Republicans won all North Florida congressional districts in the November elections.

Florida voters in 2010 approved a constitutional amendment, known as the Fair Districts amendment, that set standards for redistricting. Part of that barred drawing districts that would "diminish" the ability of minorities to "elect representatives of their choice."
"Under the stipulated facts (in the lawsuit), plaintiffs have shown that the enacted plan results in the diminishment of Black voters' ability to elect their candidate of choice in violation of the Florida Constitution," Marsh wrote.
Marsh ordered that the issue return to the Legislature "to enact a remedial map in compliance" with the state Constitution. The ruling, however, is expected to be appealed.

"This is a significant victory in the fight for fair representation for Black Floridians," Olivia Mendoza, director of litigation and policy for the National Redistricting Foundation, an affiliate of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, said in a statement. "As a result, the current discriminatory map should be replaced with a map that restores the Fifth Congressional District in a manner that gives Black voters the opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice."

Attorneys for the Florida House, Senate and Secretary of State Cord Byrd argued during a hearing last month that the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause prevented using a district similar to the district Lawson held because it would involve racial gerrymandering.
The disputed district, Congressional District 5, in the past stretched from Jacksonville to Gadsden County, west of Tallahassee, incorporating areas that had large Black populations. The 2022 plan put the district in the Jacksonville area.

But Marsh wrote that the state had not proven gerrymandering.
DeSantis cited the equal-protection issue as he effectively took control of the congressional redistricting process last year. He vetoed a plan passed by the Legislature and called a special session that ultimately led to a map that helped lead in the November elections to Florida Republicans increasing their number of U.S. House members from 16 to 20.

While the case initially addressed other districts, attorneys for the plaintiffs and the state last month agreed to narrow it to Congressional District 5. In the agreement, the state acknowledged that "if the non-diminishment standard applies to North Florida, then there is no Black-performing district in North Florida under the enacted map."
But the state maintained "that the Equal Protection Clause would nonetheless prohibit the creation of a Black-performing district in North Florida."
Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.
Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed


  • Ron DeSantis,
  • congressional redistricting plan,
  • Florida Constitution



jrDiscussion - desc
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Kavika     6 months ago

If I remember correctly DeSantis set aside the decision of the Republican legislature and pushed through the plan that has been decided to be unconstitutional.

Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @1    6 months ago

he's a devoted little fascist...

Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @1    6 months ago

What sheer arrogance

Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2    6 months ago
What sheer arrogance

I prefer to refer to it as ''stupidity'' but I'm good with ignorant arrogance as well...jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png

Professor Principal
2  seeder  Kavika     6 months ago

Well DeSantis is wracking up the legal cost while losing or having his dictates overruled.

Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @2    6 months ago

that's going to come back to bite him in the ass before the end of his useless term in office...

Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Kavika   replied to  devangelical @2.1    6 months ago

Hopefully it will, and at the rate he is racking up legal costs should help push him over the edge.


Who is online

34 visitors