Special Counsel John Durham spent four years not finding the FBI conspiracy that Trump and Barr claimed
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
When Special Counsel Bob Mueller, probing Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election by helping Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, completed his report, he sent it to Attorney General Bill Barr on March 22, 2019, a Friday. Two days later, Barr issued his own four-page summary of the report, which radically distorted and twisted Mueller's work, over Mueller's repeated objections.
It wasn't until almost a month later, on April 19, following a lengthy press conference, that Barr published Mueller's report and everyone saw that Barr had blatantly and intentionally mischaracterized Mueller's findings to undermine the truth that Putin's spies had meddled in our democratic process to try to aid Trump.
FILE - Special counsel John Durham, the prosecutor appointed to investigate potential government wrongdoing in the early days of the Trump-Russia probe, leaves federal court in Washington, May 16, 2022. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)
A month later, on May 13, Barr directed U.S. Attorney John Durham to examine the origin of the Russia probe regarding Trump's campaign (which the FBI had commenced on July 31, 2016, dubbing it Crossfire Hurricane, before Mueller took it over in 2017).
On Dec. 9, 2019, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that the FBI was warranted to open the probe.
Last Friday, one day shy of four years after Durham began, he delivered his report to AG Merrick Garland. While Barr held Mueller's report close for only two days, Garland took an extra day. But then this AG simply published the report, in full and without comment or spin or interpretation.
While Mueller rightly complained about Barr, this is what Durham wrote in his letter presenting his report to Garland: "Finally, we want to thank you and your office for permitting our inquiry to proceed independently and without interference."
Durham found no conspiracy inside the U.S. government to get Trump, although he differed from the IG that after an initial review, the FBI should have not pursued the matter of possible collusion between Trump's campaign and Moscow.
Despite the lies of Barr and Trump, this was no FBI hoax. Putin and his spies did steal emails from the Democrats and gave them to WikiLeaks. And Russia did use the internet to attack Clinton and support Trump. It was all real.
Tags
Who is online
113 visitors
"Despite Trump's and Barr's lies, it was no hoax!"
The CIA and FBI investigations (plural) of Trump's relationships with Russia were legally predicated and long predated the 2016 Presidential election.
Trump got himself investigated by seeking out and for meeting with and for establishing long term relationships with Russian secret agents...
Meanwhile, back in reality, the truth comes out...
And in 180 degree world..........................
Damn, those conspiracies are hard to find.