╌>

"Objectivity Has Got To Go": News Leaders Call for the End of Objective Journalism

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  14 comments

By:   JONATHAN TURLEY

"Objectivity Has Got To Go": News Leaders Call for the End of Objective Journalism
We previously discussed the movement in journalism schools to get rid of principles of objectivity in journalism. Advocacy journalism is the new touchstone in the media even as polls show that trust in the media is plummeting. Now, former executive editor for The Washington Post Leonard Downie Jr. and former CBS News President Andrew Heyward…

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


We previously discussed the movement in journalism schools to get rid of principles of objectivity in journalism. Advocacy journalism is the new touchstone in the media even as polls show that trust in the media is plummeting. Now, former executive editor for The Washington Post Leonard Downie Jr. and former CBS News President Andrew Heyward have released the results of their interviews with over 75 media leaders and concluded that objectivity is now considered reactionary and even harmful. Emilio Garcia-Ruiz, editor-in-chief at the San Francisco Chronicle said it plainly: "Objectivity has got to go."

Notably, while Bob Woodward and others have finally admitted that the Russian collusion coverage lacked objectivity and resulted in false reporting, media figures are pushing even harder against objectivity as a core value in journalism.

We have been discussing the rise of advocacy journalism and the rejection of objectivity in journalism schools. Writers, editors, commentators, and academics have embraced rising calls for censorship and speech controls, including President-elect Joe Biden and his key advisers. This movement includes academics rejecting the very concept of objectivity in journalism in favor of open advocacy.

Columbia Journalism Dean and New Yorker writer Steve Coll decried how the First Amendment right to freedom of speech was being "weaponized" to protect disinformation. In an interview with The Stanford Daily , Stanford journalism professor, Ted Glasser, insisted that journalism needed to "free itself from this notion of objectivity to develop a sense of social justice." He rejected the notion that journalism is based on objectivity and said that he views "journalists as activists because journalism at its best — and indeed history at its best — is all about morality." Thus, "Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it's hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity."

Lauren Wolfe, the fired freelance editor for the New York Times, has not only gone public to defend her pro-Biden tweet but published a piece titled " I'm a Biased Journalist and I'm Okay With That ."

Former New York Times writer (and now Howard University Journalism Professor) Nikole Hannah-Jones is a leading voice for advocacy journalism.

Indeed, Hannah-Jones has declared "all journalism is activism." Her 1619 Project has been challenged as deeply flawed and she has a long record as a journalist of intolerance, controversial positions on rioting, and fostering conspiracy theories. Hannah-Jones would later help lead the effort at the Times to get rid of an editor and apologize for publishing a column from Sen. Tom Cotten as inaccurate and inflammatory.

Polls show trust in the media at an all-time low with less than 20 percent of citizens trusting television or print media. Yet, reporters and academics continue to destroy the core principles that sustain journalism and ultimately the role of a free press in our society. Notably, writers who have been repeatedly charged with false or misleading columns are some of the greatest advocates for dropping objectivity in journalism.

Now the leaders of media companies are joining this self-destructive movement. They are not speaking of columnists or cable hosts who routinely share opinions. They are speaking of actual journalists, the people who are relied upon to report the news.

Saying that "Objectivity has got to go" is, of course, liberating. You can dispense with the necessities of neutrality and balance. You can cater to your "base" like columnists and opinion writers. Sharing the opposing view is now dismissed as "bothsidesism." Done. No need to give credence to opposing views. It is a familiar reality for those of us in higher education, which has been increasingly intolerant of opposing or dissenting views.

Downie recounts how news leaders today


"believe that pursuing objectivity can lead to false balance or misleading "bothsidesism" in covering stories about race, the treatment of women, LGBTQ+ rights, income inequality, climate change and many other subjects. And, in today's diversifying newsrooms, they feel it negates many of their own identities, life experiences and cultural contexts, keeping them from pursuing truth in their work."

There was a time when all journalists shared a common "identity" as professionals who were able to separate their own bias and values from the reporting of the news.

Now, objectivity is virtually synonymous with prejudice. Kathleen Carroll, former executive editor at the Associated Press declared "It's objective by whose standard? … That standard seems to be White, educated, and fairly wealthy."

Outlets like NPR are quickly erasing any lines between journalists and advocates. NPR announced that reporters could participate in activities that advocate for "freedom and dignity of human beings" on social media and in real life.

Downie echoes such views and declares "What we found has convinced us that truth-seeking news media must move beyond whatever 'objectivity' once meant to produce more trustworthy news."

Really? Being less objective will make the news more trustworthy? That does not seem to have worked for years but Downie and others are doubling down like bad gamblers at Vegas.

Indeed, the whole "Let's Go Brandon" chant is as much a criticism of the media as it is President Biden.

If there is little difference between the mainstream media and alternative media, the public will continue the trend away from the former. MSM has the most to lose from this movement, but, as individual editors, it remains popular to yield to advocates in their ranks. That is what the New York Times did when it threw its own editors under the bus to satisfy the mob.

As media outlets struggle to survive, these media leaders are feverishly sawing at the tree branch upon which they sit.


05282015_66951-e1532723116454.jpg?fit=297%2C300&ssl=1
Jonathan Turley


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    last year

A free press which uses that very freedom to push propaganda.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

The irony of your thoughts and expressions is indeed rich. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    last year

Weren't you the one who praised the idea of journalists turning to activism?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    last year

So which side are you on?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    last year

You are up to your neck in right wing propaganda yet you feel the need to seed this. 

Irony. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.3    last year

Irony is you claiming someone else is posting propaganda.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.3    last year

The New York Times admitted it.

And you supported it.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
1.2  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year
A free press which uses that very freedom to push propaganda.

Please see this page for the most propaganda on the web! 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

People who should never be President  like Trump and Biden flourish in a world with media that makes no attempt to be objective.  

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
3  Hallux    last year

When did Jonathon Turley become an objective news reporter?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hallux @3    last year

When did he claim to be?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @3    last year

He is a Law Professor

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.2.1  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2    last year

Turley is the Gobel of MAGA propagandists!

George Gobel...

original

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4  Nerm_L    last year

Doesn't anyone understand what objective journalism is about any longer?  Every course of action (especially those pursued by government) will have positive and negative consequences.  Objective journalism is supposed to report on both the positive and negative consequences.  That's the balance in balanced journalism.

Advocacy journalism (as the name suggests) only reports on positive consequences and ignores the negative.  When those negative consequences inevitably emerge, the public is blindsided.  And unexpected negative consequences naturally causes the public to lose faith in advocates.

We can already see the outcome of advocacy planning.  The Biden administration relies on an advocacy style of planning.  Biden plans for the positive consequences, completely ignores the negative consequences in planning, and then blames scapegoats when the negative consequences inevitably arise.  That's why the Biden administration has to react to crisis after crisis.  There hasn't been any planning for negative consequences.

A balanced approach is necessary to prepare for both positive and negative consequences.  And the public needs to be informed about both positive and negative consequences.  Otherwise we become a society that is in constant crisis.  And the natural public response is to resist moving forward until the crisis abates.  An advocacy approach ultimately results in a stagnant society that only tries to prepare itself for the next unknown crisis.

 
 

Who is online



devangelical
Kavika


34 visitors