╌>

Oh no, it happened again: a famous woman didn't follow the rules of ageing | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  11 months ago  •  13 comments

By:   Arwa Mahdawi

Oh no, it happened again: a famous woman didn't follow the rules of ageing | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian
Meg Ryan was declared 'unrecognizable' in headlines after attending a screening - even though the tabloids clearly recognized her

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


512

Meg Ryan was declared 'unrecognizable' in headlines after attending a screening - even though the tabloids clearly recognized her

Meg Ryan leaves house, faces instant misogyny


Oh no, it's happened again. Every now and again a famous woman over the age of 45 has the temerity to go out in public without following The Rules of Ageing While Female and all hell breaks loose. This time the offender is Meg Ryan. The 61-year-old actor attended a documentary screening in New York this week, sparking immediately scrutiny from all the usual tabloids about her appearance and how much plastic surgery she might have had. Both the Daily Mail and Page Six declared Ryan "unrecognizable" in their headlines. Which is weird, because they clearly recognized her.

Anyway, since so many people seem to be unaware of how to age in a tabloid-friendly manner, a quick recap of The Rules. First and foremost, ladies, remember that you need to age gracefully and naturally . But not toonaturally. Not so naturally that you get wrinkles and grey hair and actually look your age. Yuck! Not like that. No, you need to age naturally in a way that makes it looks like you haven't aged at all. You need to age in a way which makes it seem like you're still youthful enough for Leonardo DiCaprio to consider dating. Which, unless you have a portrait in an attic somewhere or are half-vampire, probably means getting plastic surgery.

Which takes us to rule number two: if you get surgery, you need your surgery to look completely effortless . You don't want your face to scream: "I've just spent the GDP of a small country on my fillers!" You don't want anyone to suspect you've had work done because, come on, that's just tragic. Remember, women are supposed to ace gracefully and naturally and surgery is neither of those things.

Finally, rule number three. If you are incapable of ageing in a way that would please a committee consisting of the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Piers Morgan and Don Lemon then DO NOT LEAVE THE HOUSE. Ageing inappropriately in a public space is just very bad form if you're a woman. (If you're a man, of course, things are different: you're a silver fox who only gets better with every passing year!)

Got all that? Good. The Rules are really very simple. I'm not sure why so many women have a hard time with them. Ryan, after all, is not the first woman whose face has caused a tabloid frenzy this year. A few weeks ago, Page Six ran a headline stating: "Bridget Fonda unrecognizable during rare outing 20 years after quitting acting." The Daily Mail ran an almost identical headline. There is nothing tabloids seem to enjoy more than recognizing famous women and promptly proclaiming her unrecognizable.

And then of course there's all the furor over Madonna's face. Earlier this year, Madonna's appearance at the Grammys caused intense speculation about how much cosmetic surgery she'd had done. Piers Morgan, never one to miss a chance to indulge in some casual misogyny, shared a closeup photo of the 64-year-old pop legend with the caption: "I thought Halloween was in October." Madonna responded to the chatter about her looks with a scathing statement on Instagram about being caught, once again, "in the glare of ageism and misogyny that permeates the world we live in … A world that refuses to celebrate women past the age of 45."

There is, as should be very clear by now, simply no way to win as a woman. So don't even bother trying to age gracefully. "It's much better to age disgracefully!" Helen Mirren told Vogue a few years ago. "Take it on the chin, and roll with it. You die young, or you get older. There is nothing in between! You may as well enjoy it." And if you don't enjoy it, then whatever you do, don't frown: that leaves terrible marks.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  Buzz of the Orient    11 months ago

Just watched her in On the Ropes yesterday - she was looking pretty good in that movie.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    11 months ago

I think we can all admit that things are different for women.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3  Bob Nelson    11 months ago

Things may be slowly getting better. Frances McDormand was impossible a few decades ago.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    11 months ago

Good point.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
4  sandy-2021492    11 months ago

We went through this with Rene Zellweger a few years ago.  Both beautiful women and excellent actresses, who have trouble getting roles in Hollywood because they can no longer play the ingenue.

American actresses are damned if they do, damned if they don't.

We really should emulate the UK in this area.  Older female actresses are celebrated, not excluded.  Helen Mirren, Maggie Smith, Judi Dench, the late Diana Rigg - all able to get good roles without getting nipped and tucked. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4    11 months ago

Meg Ryan's career, as an A-list star at least, collapsed before she got old and before she had plastic surgery.  She is a mediocre actress who became typecast in a time period before being typecast was considered acceptable. McDormand is typecast, but she is a great actress who will always be offered those parts. 

Although I very much agree that female actors suffer from age discrimination more than males, I think there is more to it than that. 

Meg Ryan isnt a good enough actress to overcome her circumstances. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JBB  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    11 months ago

That is harsh and uncalled for. Ryan is ten years older than Gloria Swanson was when she was typecast as Norma Desmond the dried up unwanted washout of a star in youth obsessed Hollywood. She had a run and does not deserve such contempt...

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
4.1.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    11 months ago

I thought Ryan handled a variety of roles well.  Yes, she was typecast for rom-com, but she did do some dramatic roles, and IMO, did them well.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.1.2    11 months ago

She has always been one of my favorite actresses.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.1.2    11 months ago

I dont think she's terrible, but I also dont think she is good enough to overcome typecasting. Her career was going down long before she "got old".  She hasnt had a hit movie in the 21st century.  In the year 2000 she was 38 years old. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  JBB @4.1.1    11 months ago

I have no contempt for her at all. She's not a great actress. She filled a type as the "girl next door" in a series of hit romantic comedies. 

Sally Field is still going strong, as are Jane Fonda, Diane Keaton, Sandra Bullock, Glenn Close, and a lot of others. Bullock is only three years younger than Meg Ryan. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5  Hal A. Lujah    11 months ago

Well, in a world where it gets increasingly harder to crack a smile with every passing day, sometimes risky assistance is needed.

384

 
 
 
Hallux
Masters Principal
6  Hallux    11 months ago

Old gold still glitters ...

 
 

Who is online




Jeremy Retired in NC
shona1


75 visitors